5 SiteGround Alternatives In 2025 That Are Cheaper…and Often Better

SiteGround offers hosting plans starting at $2.99 per month. Yes, that is true…but that’s only for the first year. Once that introductory period ends, the price jumps to $17.99 per month. Over five years, you’re looking at spending $899.40, and over ten years, that total climbs to $1,978.80. If you’re reading this, you’re probably already aware of this and are searching for more affordable options.

The good news is there are cheaper SiteGround alternatives that perform just as well.

I’m not just saying this – I’ve spent several years researching the hosting market. Our team runs WordPress hosting surveys annually and maintains testing environments for each host we evaluate. In fact, we’ve conducted over 23,000 performance tests to date.

With all this data in hand, I can confidently recommend a few solid SiteGround alternatives that should fit your budget and needs.

I’ve tried to focus on identifying good alternatives for a couple of common scenarios.

• Most importantly, all hosts can handle WordPress and can handle WordPress well.
• First, I recommend alternatives for short-term hosting – one year or so.
• Then, I also recommend alternatives for longer-term hosting – from three up to ten years (biggest savings there!)

Here are the best, cheaper SiteGround alternatives on the market:

Bluehost

If you’re looking for a cheaper alternative to SiteGround, I’d recommend giving Bluehost a look. Aside from being one of the very few officially recommended hosting companies by WordPress.org, ¹ their three-year plan starts at $1.99 per month, which is already less than what SiteGround offers. While over the first year, you’d end up paying $33.48 total (more than with SiteGround), your savings will kick in as early as year three. Over the long haul, Bluehost ends up being half as expensive as SiteGround. Bluehost also includes some helpful extras, like a free domain for the first year and easy WordPress setup, which makes getting your site up and running pretty straightforward.

Based on our test setups, Bluehost performs well in key areas. They offer solid uptime and good loading speeds, especially if your audience is in the U.S. or Europe. In our hosting survey, Bluehost scored 7.10, which I think is a good rating considering how widely used it is. Just like SiteGround, though, Bluehost’s prices go up after the first year. In Bluehost’s case to $9.99-$11.99 per month, so that’s something to keep in mind if you plan to stay with them longer.

What stands out are the savings you can get over time. For example, you’d save over $300 on a 3-year plan compared to SiteGround, and more than $900 over 10 years. If you’re after a reliable and affordable hosting option with some decent long-term savings, Bluehost is definitely a solid choice. Just watch out for the storage and traffic limits if your site starts to grow, since their basic plan does have some restrictions.

👉 Go here for a full review of Bluehost, and here for a direct comparison against SiteGround.

SIDE-BY-SIDE Comparison of Entry-Level Plan vs SiteGround 🪞

Features that make Bluehost good for WordPress

• Free WordPress migration tool
• WordPress staging site
• SSH and WP-CLI
• Free CDN – Cloudflare with argo routing
• Web application firewall
• DDos protection
• Free malware scanning
• Managed WordPress updates
• Managed PHP updates
• Static content caching
• Object caching

Uptime last three months 𝒾We track the performance metrics of each of our test setups continuously. This includes their load times from multiple locations around the globe, and uptime percentage over the years. See the live status page of Bluehost linked below.

Performance this month

Namecheap

If you’re looking for an affordable long-term alternative to SiteGround, nothing beats Namecheap.

For example, over 5 years, it’ll cost you $280.56, which is almost $620 cheaper than SiteGround. If you’re in it for the long term, the 10-year cost is only $588.96, which saves you over $1,390 compared to SiteGround.

However, if you’re only thinking short-term, the cost difference is actually in SiteGround’s favor. For a one-year plan, it’s about $12 more expensive than SiteGround, totaling $38.88 for the first year vs SiteGround’s $35.88.

Even though it’s one of the cheapest hosts out there, Namecheap still offers solid performance. With their entry level plan, you can host one site and welcome up to 50,000 visitors, and get 10 GB of disk space – plenty for smaller sites or new projects.

In terms of reliability, we’ve found that Namecheap holds up well, especially for US-based traffic. It offers good uptime and competitive loading speeds, and users have rated it highly in our survey, with an 8.03 score. If you’re after a low-cost, long-term hosting solution that still delivers decent performance, Namecheap is a great option to consider.

SIDE-BY-SIDE Comparison of Entry-Level Plan vs SiteGround 🪞

Features that make Namecheap good for WordPress

• Easy-to-use dashboard to manage WordPress websites
• Free CDN
• Easy backups and restores
• SFTP and database access
• Email hosting included (30 mailboxes)

Uptime last three months 𝒾We track the performance metrics of each of our test setups continuously. This includes their load times from multiple locations around the globe, and uptime percentage over the years. See the live status page of Namecheap linked below.

Performance this month

Hostinger

Next on my list of affordable alternatives to SiteGround is Hostinger. Their one-year plan costs $3.14 per month, which works out to $37.68 for the year – pretty close to SiteGround’s pricing. But the longer you stick with them, the more you save. For example, if you buy a two-year plan followed by a one-year plan (three years total) it will cost $196.44, which is almost $280 cheaper than SiteGround. Over five years, you’d pay $217.80, saving you more than $660 compared to SiteGround (this is the cheapest offer on our list).

Even though it’s budget-friendly, Hostinger still offers a lot. You get a free domain for the first year, SSL, and one-click WordPress installation. Their basic plan gives you 25 GB of storage and supports up to 25 websites, which is plenty of room for most projects. It can handle around 25,000 visits per month, so unless you’re expecting major traffic spikes, it should meet your needs just fine.

From our experience, Hostinger’s performance is solid. They have great uptime and reliable speeds, which is important if you want your site to be consistent. Customers seem to agree, too – it scored an 8.11 in our recent survey. If you’re looking for a cheaper hosting option with a lot of features and good long-term savings, Hostinger is definitely worth considering.

SIDE-BY-SIDE Comparison of Entry-Level Plan vs SiteGround 🪞

Features that make Hostinger good for WordPress

• Free 1-click WordPress installation
• Free pre-built templates
• WordPress auto updates
• WordPress vulnerabilities scanner
• WordPress compatibility checker
• WordPress multisite
• WP-CLI and SSH
• Free 1-click Google integration with Search Console and Analytics

Uptime last three months 𝒾We track the performance metrics of each of our test setups continuously. This includes their load times from multiple locations around the globe, and uptime percentage over the years. See the live status page of Hostinger linked below.

Performance this month

IONOS

If you’re looking for the absolute cheapest option to get started with hosting, IONOS is hard to beat. Their cheapest one-year plan is the mid-tier option and it comes in at just $1.00 per month, so you’ll only pay $12.00 for the entire first year, which is $24 cheaper than SiteGround. It’s by far the lowest price you’ll find for short-term hosting.

However, after that first year, you’ll need to switch to the entry-level plan to keep the cost down, especially if you’re planning to stay with them for several years. Alternatively, you can sign up for a three year contract on the entry-level plan from the start and pay just $144.00. That comes out to $4 per month over the life of the contract. Overall, IONOS remains a solid value with long-term savings of over $1,330 compared to SiteGround over ten years.

What I like about IONOS is that even with their rock-bottom pricing, you still get a lot of useful features. The entry-level plan lets you host one website, offers 25 GB of SSD storage, 9 GB of RAM, and even includes AI tools to help with website creation and chatbot integration. You also get a free domain for the first year, along with one email address.

If you’re mainly focused on keeping your short-term costs down and want a reliable, low-cost solution, IONOS is definitely worth a look. Just be aware that if you opt for the mid-tier $1 per month deal, you’ll need to adjust your plan after the first year.

SIDE-BY-SIDE Comparison of Entry-Level Plan vs SiteGround 🪞

Features that make IONOS good for WordPress

• SSH, SFTP, WP-CLI access
• SiteAnalytics
• Customizable updates
• Malware scanning
• Vulnerability scanning
• Customized caching
• Free SSL
• Daily backups

Uptime last three months 𝒾We track the performance metrics of each of our test setups continuously. This includes their load times from multiple locations around the globe, and uptime percentage over the years.

Performance this month

DreamHost

DreamHost has been a mainstay in the WordPress hosting space for a long time now.

If you’re considering it as an alternative to SiteGround, you’re going to be thinking long-term – this is where the real savings kick in. For example, a three-year plan will cost you $191.64, which saves you over $260 compared to SiteGround. Over five years, DreamHost comes in at $227.40, saving you more than $620, and for ten years, you’ll save around $1,230.

What I also like about DreamHost is that it’s not just cheap … it’s also packed with solid features. You get unlimited traffic, 25 GB of disk space, and can host as many as 25 websites(!), which is perfect for multiple small to medium-sized projects.

It also comes with a free domain on the entry plan, and the user-friendly control panel and one-click WordPress installation make setup a breeze. In terms of performance, DreamHost does well with uptime, though its load times are about average compared to other hosts. They offer 24/7 support through online tickets and live chat during business hours, which is helpful if you need assistance.

SIDE-BY-SIDE Comparison of Entry-Level Plan vs SiteGround 🪞

Features that make DreamHost good for WordPress

• WordPress preinstalled
• Free automated WordPress migrations
• WordPress website builder
• AI business advisor
• Automatic WordPress updates
• Automated daily backups
• SFTP, shell access, WP-CLI

Uptime last three months 𝒾We track the performance metrics of each of our test setups continuously. This includes their load times from multiple locations around the globe, and uptime percentage over the years. See the live status page of DreamHost linked below.

Performance this month

My top recommendations

Two options stand out, each suited for different needs:

1. Namecheap – best for long-term hosting

If you’re focused on long-term savings, Namecheap is the top choice. Over 10 years, you’ll save ~$1,390 compared to SiteGround, making it ideal for small to medium sites. With the ability to handle ~50,000 visits monthly and giving you 10 GB of storage, it’s perfect for those looking to keep costs low without sacrificing basic performance.

2. IONOS – best for short-term hosting

For short-term hosting, IONOS is a great pick. It’s affordable upfront – super affordable, actually – at $12.00 for the whole year. Plus, it offers easy WordPress installs, a “WordPress Website Cockpit,” 25 GB of storage, and a free domain for the first year. If you need a fast, reliable setup and room to scale, IONOS is a good choice.

More about our methodology

I know that choosing the right hosting provider is tough. We’ve been developing a detailed methodology to test and review hosts so that we can then recommend them to our readers. Since 2009, we’ve reviewed over 20 providers, combining expert analysis, user feedback, and performance monitoring. While our in-house team offers honest opinions and testing, our annual surveys provide insights from real users:

• We start by signing up for hosting plans and setting up test sites with demo data. Then, we run performance tests, tracking load times globally and monitoring uptime. Hosts are rated on pricing, features, and real-time testing. We account for hidden fees and discounts and evaluate key features like storage and bandwidth.
• Since 2016, we’ve also been running user surveys that gather feedback on various hosting providers. These surveys run discreetly on our sites to capture honest, unfiltered feedback, providing valuable insights into the pros and cons of each host.

I hope this guide has helped you find the right budget-friendly alternative to SiteGround that fits your specific needs. Whether you’re looking for a short-term solution or a host with particular features, there’s an option out there for you! If you have any questions or need further clarification about the hosts mentioned, feel free to ask in the comments.

FREE GUIDE

4 Essential Steps to Speed Up Your WordPress Website

Follow the simple steps in our 4-part mini series and reduce your loading times by 50-80%. 🚀

Site Speed Guide - Below Post

Your Email *

Subscribe to our newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter

FREE ACCESS

If you are human, leave this field blank.

Δ